Friday, May 31, 2019

Explicit teaching of Phonics








Explicit teaching of Phonics - helping our students learn to read and write.


The goal of phonics instruction is to help our students learn the alphabetic principle — the idea that letters represent the sounds of spoken language — and that there is a predictable relationship between written letters and spoken sounds. In our COL we have students who are learning English and as we all know that English is a challenging language to master with some many combinations of sounds.

My research has consistently found that explicit systematic phonics instruction is one of the most effective ways to teach children how to read, especially for students who are struggling to learn to read or have language difficulties. So why do we not continue to teach our students phonics when they still need this explicit input as they move up through school year levels. As our students move up through the school there seems to be little focus in fulling the gaps in the student’s skill.

Phonics teaches pupils that letters they see written on a page are part of a code which represents the sounds of spoken language, and provides them with the tools to understand this magic code. When these skills are developed and embedded the students can then become fluent readers who are able to quickly recognise familiar words and easily sound out new words they encounter. Imagine reading and writing a language you just don't understand the rules of the language and have to stop and decode every word. 
Phonics allows our readers to develop their reading comprehension. With enough teaching of skills and practice, pupils' decoding skills should become so automatic that they are able to concentrate on and understand the overall meaning of what they are reading. While students are struggling to decode and recognise sounds and words it is very challenging to comprehend the text they are reading.

Vocabulary instruction can go hand-in-hand with phonics instruction which is a recognised area of need in our COL.  This is an opportunity to embed Keywords that contain the target letter-sound relationships etc that we are focusing on in our current topic. Teaching phonics and vocabulary can be done in a fun and interesting ways. 
Even our older Year 7 and 8 students enjoy games and competition when it's done in a nonthreatening manner.
My plan moving forward is to work with Robyn Anderson a COL teacher from Panmure Bridge School to see if creating a Phonics programme for identified students in her Year 7/8 will have a positive impact on students Reading and Writing.

Robyn has blogged about our discussion on her blog



Explicit acts of teaching - making the biggest difference





During our COL PLG we were discussing how can we replicate the accelerated progress we achieve in writing and our other focused areas, maths and reading.
There seems to be an overwhelming need to ensure we are using explicit acts of teaching.


Deliberate acts of teaching instructional strategies are the tools of effective practice. They are the deliberate acts of teaching that focus learning in order to meet a particular purpose. Instructional strategies are effective only when they impact positively on students' learning.

Teachers need to be able to use a range of deliberate acts of teaching inflexible and integrated ways within learning activities to meet the diverse literacy learning needs of our students.
These deliberate acts may include modelling, prompting, questioning, giving feedback, telling, explaining, and directing in your class programme.
Giving students explicit instruction about learning strategies will help them take control of their own learning. Deliberate acts of teaching showing our students how to make clear explicit links to prior knowledge and connection to their environment must impact student achievement as well as building new learning.
Sometimes i think we confuse implicit and explicit in our teaching. Our students with language or learning difficulties need very explicit acts of teaching.
Something is implicit when it is implied but not directly stated. Something is explicit when it is directly stated and leaves no room for uncertainty. Our students need EXPLICIT teaching.

Wanting reminders of what explicit acts of teaching look like in Literacy check out: 
I found this an interesting read around mathematical strategies:

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Snap shot - Learning data


Time to get a snapshot of where the target group of students I am supporting at Panmure Bridge are at the end of Term One.
I carried out the phonics assessment in the Criterion Assessment and Robyn Anderson has kindly shared her results from Term  One.




After looking at this data there is a need to continue with the  Phonics programme that Robyn has carefully crafted.  It is also interesting to note the other factors that are impacting on student progress including self-esteem, attitude. confidence and self-esteem.

Robyn is using the data to create a Needs focused 'Phonics programme" to cater for her year 7/8 students who still need to grasp a full understanding of phonics.

Robyn Anderson blogged about our meeting. Across school teacher support.

Friday, May 24, 2019

Why are our students not getting the support they need.


This year I have been working with the Team from the Welcome to School project to gather assessment information on the students they assessed two years ago.

Moira Nelson SLT has reassessed these students on their Core language skills including Receptive and Expressive language. Some students have made great progress, for example, a student moving from 1st percentile to the 63rd!!
However, she also found several students who are significantly below in Language.
We were interested to see if the students who were still significantly below have been identified by the school and receiving additional support from the Ministry or RTLB.

Very few of the students were receiving additional support from an outside agency and those that were seemed to have support mostly due to social and behavioural needs.

Why are our students not getting the support they need?

I have identified the following hypothesis

1.  When you have a large number of students in your classroom with language and learning delays you are less likely to identify the students that are significantly below.

2. There is no official MOE provided assessment or screening tool for teachers or Senco's to use to easily identify these students.

3. Most of our Manaiakalani schools do not have a designated Senco person who has the time and expertise to identify and assess these students. Our Sencos are often the Principals or Senior Management, who have this responsibility on top of an already extensive workload.
Schools in higher decile areas often have a designated teacher with responsibility for Special needs and release time to carry out this role.

This impacts on schools abilities to assess students and once identified have time to complete the required paperwork to request additional support needed from outside agencies.


In class support:
 I  had the opportunity to be part of an allocation meeting. Students receive points under different criteria. The first criteria is whether a student has had previous intervention or assessments etc from other agencies or professionals eg SLT, Paediatrician, Occupational therapist etc.
As we are all aware currently the easiest way to access these is private, a cost our families can not afford.  Some students had seen multiple professionals so gained several points towards receiving in-class support funding. In one case a student received 6 points before we looked at his academic results.
Students in our COL may have been academically lower than these students but did not gain enough points to receive funding.  This puts our students at a significant disadvantage.

RTlit

There are projects being run in the community by the RTlit that would benefit our students significantly. Currently, the allocation of these projects has gone to schools in higher decile areas within our immediate community.
Is this because they have Senco who can be released to find out about these projects, attend meetings in school time and assess the students and complete the applications before our COL schools have even heard about these projects?



I wonder if the new Learning Support Coordinators that have been promised for 2020 will be allocated to our schools?

Our students deserve better !









Monday, May 20, 2019

Knowing your learner , digging a little deeper.




Supporting our students to acquire literacy skills can look very different, according to the context, the desired outcomes and most of all, our learners. Knowing your learners is vital to teaching and learning. Once we know each learner, we can scaffold their learning and put in place for most appropriate programmes and teaching strategies that will help our learners stretch to reach new levels and gain appropriate necessary skills.

When I work with teachers, I have noticed how challenging it is for these teachers to identify exactly what the learner needs to learn when they are well below their chronological peers. To be a competent reader we need a range of skills, it’s like a big jigsaw puzzle. For some of our learners, there are pieces of this puzzle missing which means they are not able to use this knowledge to be competent literacy learners.






Recently, I have noticed the need to go back to basics. Our learners need explicit teaching of strategies and knowledge. One common area seems to be a need more focus on Phonological awareness such as rhyming, word families and onset rime.

eg :     The "onset" is the initial phonological unit of any word (e.g. c in cat) and the term "rime" refers to the string of letters that follow, usually a vowel and final consonants (e.g. at in cat).

  • ·       They help our learners learn about word families, which can lay the foundation for future spelling strategies
  • ·       Teaching our learners to attend to onset and rime will have a positive effect on their literacy skills
  • ·       Learning these components of phonological awareness is strongly predictive of reading and spelling acquisition